{"id":43514,"date":"2026-09-13T19:04:57","date_gmt":"2026-09-13T19:04:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/13\/flas-gelisme-ergenekon-dosyasinda-kritik-karar-21-ihrac-hakim-ve-savci-icin-zamanasimi-karari-kaldirildi\/"},"modified":"2026-09-13T19:04:57","modified_gmt":"2026-09-13T19:04:57","slug":"flas-gelisme-ergenekon-dosyasinda-kritik-karar-21-ihrac-hakim-ve-savci-icin-zamanasimi-karari-kaldirildi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/13\/flas-gelisme-ergenekon-dosyasinda-kritik-karar-21-ihrac-hakim-ve-savci-icin-zamanasimi-karari-kaldirildi\/","title":{"rendered":"FLA\u015e GEL\u0130\u015eME! Ergenekon dosyas\u0131nda kritik karar: 21 ihra\u00e7 h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131 i\u00e7in zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 karar\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131!"},"content":{"rendered":"

SON.TV\/\u0130STANBUL<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kamuoyunda \u201cErgenekon<\/strong>\u201d olarak bilinen soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturmalarda g\u00f6rev yapan eski h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar hakk\u0131ndaki dosyada yarg\u0131 s\u00fcrecini yeniden hareketlendiren bir karar verildi.<\/p>\n

Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong>n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren \u0130stanbul Anadolu 26. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30 Mart 2026 tarihli<\/strong> zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul Anadolu 26. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemes<\/strong>inin 2026\/503 De\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 dosyada verdi\u011fi 10 Temmuz 2026 tarihli karar\u0131n kesin oldu\u011fu, dosyan\u0131n yeniden Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi<\/strong>ne g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n

21 \u0130HRA\u00c7 H\u00c2K\u0130M VE SAVCI HAKKINDA S\u00dcRE\u00c7<\/strong><\/p>\n

Soru\u015fturman\u0131n, Ergenekon soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturmalar\u0131nda g\u00f6rev yapan 21 ihra\u00e7 h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131 hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bildirildi.<\/p>\n

Dosyada, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin FET\u00d6\/PDY\u2019nin ama\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda yarg\u0131 yetkisini kulland\u0131klar\u0131; sahte delil olu\u015fturma, usuls\u00fcz arama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131, tutuklama, dinleme ve farkl\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u015flemlerde bulunduklar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde isnatlar bulunuyor.<\/p>\n

S\u00f6z konusu eylemler \u015f\u00fcphelilere y\u00f6neltilen su\u00e7lamalar kapsam\u0131nda dosyada yer al\u0131yor ve haklar\u0131ndaki nihai hukuki de\u011ferlendirme yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde yap\u0131lacak.<\/p>\n

DOSYADA ADI GE\u00c7EN ESK\u0130 H\u00c2K\u0130M VE SAVCILAR<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k bilgilendirmesinde, olay tarihindeki unvanlar\u0131yla Zekeriya \u00d6z, Fikret Se\u00e7en, S\u00fcleyman Pehlivan, Mehmet Ali Pekg\u00fczel, Nihat Ta\u015fk\u0131n, Ercan \u015eafak, Mehmet Murat Y\u00f6nder ve Mehmet Murat Dalku eski \u0130stanbul savc\u0131lar\u0131 olarak s\u0131raland\u0131.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Eski h\u00e2kimlerden ise Hasan H\u00fcseyin \u00d6zese, H\u00fcsn\u00fc \u00c7almuk, Metin \u00d6z\u00e7elik, \u00d6mer Diken, Mehmet Karababa, Dr. Sedat Sami Ha\u015f\u0131lo\u011flu, Davut Bedir, \u0130dris Asan, R\u00fcstem Ery\u0131lmaz, Yakup Hakan G\u00fcnay, Ali Efendi Peksak ve Murat \u00dcr\u00fcnd\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn isimleri a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Payla\u015f\u0131lan isim listesinde 20 ki\u015fi bulunmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131ndaki toplam \u015f\u00fcpheli say\u0131s\u0131 21 olarak bildirildi. Bu nedenle a\u00e7\u0131klamada yer almayan 21\u2019inci ki\u015fiyle ilgili do\u011frulanmam\u0131\u015f bir isim habere eklenmedi.<\/p>\n

Benzer \u015fekilde Ergenekon soru\u015fturmalar\u0131nda g\u00f6rev yapan baz\u0131 eski h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda daha \u00f6nce de hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 arama ve yarg\u0131sal i\u015flemler iddias\u0131yla farkl\u0131 soru\u015fturmalar y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131k kaynaklara yans\u0131m\u0131\u015ft\u0131.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

DOSYA 2008-2010 D\u00d6NEM\u0130N\u0130 KAPSIYOR<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130ncelemeye konu eylemlerin 2008-2010 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u0130stanbul\u2019<\/strong>da ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi bildirildi.<\/p>\n

Dosyan\u0131n merkezinde Ergenekon soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturmalar\u0131n\u0131n ma\u011fdur ve m\u00fc\u015ftekilerine y\u00f6nelik ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen arama, dinleme, g\u00f6zalt\u0131, tutuklama ve delil i\u015flemleri bulunuyor.<\/p>\n

12 MA\u011eDUR VE M\u00dc\u015eTEK\u0130 DOSYADA<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na g\u00f6re dosyada Ahmet Tatar, Erg\u00fcn Poyraz, Hikmet \u00c7i\u00e7ek, Kemal Kerin\u00e7siz, Kemal Yal\u00e7\u0131n Alemdaro\u011flu, Mustafa D\u00f6nmez, Mustafa H\u00fcseyin Buzo\u011flu, Mustafa Levent G\u00f6kta\u015f, Nusret Senem, Oktay Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m, Serdar \u00d6zt\u00fcrk ve Tun\u00e7er K\u0131l\u0131n\u00e7 ma\u011fdur veya m\u00fc\u015fteki olarak yer ald\u0131.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u015e\u00fcphelilerin bu ki\u015filere y\u00f6nelik ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdikleri ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve usuls\u00fcz i\u015flemler soru\u015fturman\u0131n konusu oldu.<\/p>\n

HSK 2021\u2019DE KOVU\u015eTURMA \u0130ZN\u0130 VERD\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dosyan\u0131n \u00f6nemli a\u015famalar\u0131ndan biri H\u00e2kimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kurulu \u0130kinci Dairesi<\/strong>nin 14 Ekim 2021 tarihli karar\u0131 oldu.<\/p>\n

HSK \u0130kinci Dairesini<\/strong>n 2020\/408 Esas ve 2021\/279 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla kovu\u015fturma izni verilmesinin ard\u0131ndan Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f<\/strong>\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 20 Ocak 2022 tarih ve 2022\/4 esas say\u0131l\u0131 iddianame niteli\u011findeki talepname haz\u0131rland\u0131.<\/p>\n

Talepnamede \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda \u201cson soru\u015fturman\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131\u201d istendi.<\/p>\n

SON SORU\u015eTURMA A\u00c7ILIRSA YARGILAMA YARGITAY\u2019DA<\/strong><\/p>\n

2802 say\u0131l\u0131 H\u00e2kimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda, su\u00e7 tarihinde h\u00e2kim veya savc\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda HSK<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan verilen kovu\u015fturma izni sonras\u0131 ilgili a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin \u201cson soru\u015fturman\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131\u201d karar\u0131 vermesi halinde esas yarg\u0131lama Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n ilgili ceza dairesinde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n

Benzer eski h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131 dosyalar\u0131nda da ayn\u0131 usul\u00fcn i\u015fletildi\u011fi daha \u00f6nce kamuoyuna yans\u0131m\u0131\u015ft\u0131.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

BAKIRK\u00d6Y 11. A\u011eIR CEZA MAHKEMES\u0130 ZAMANA\u015eIMI KARARI VERD\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi,<\/strong> 30 Mart 2026 tarihli ek karar\u0131yla dosyaya konu su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ola\u011fan ve ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcrelerinin doldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirmesinde bulundu.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme bu gerek\u00e7eyle \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda \u201cson soru\u015fturman\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na\u201d karar verdi.<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong> itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvurdu.<\/p>\n

BA\u015eSAVCILIK \u0130T\u0130RAZ ETT\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130stanbul Anadolu 26. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi<\/strong>ne sundu\u011fu itirazda dosyaya konu eylemlerin basit veya m\u00fcnferit adli hatalar olarak de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fini savundu.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k<\/strong>, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin FET\u00d6\/PDY<\/strong> hiyerar\u015fisi ve ama\u00e7lar\u0131 dahilinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdikleri ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen sahte delil ihdas\u0131, usuls\u00fcz arama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131, tutuklama, dinleme ve di\u011fer i\u015flemlerin bireysel su\u00e7 kapsam\u0131nda ele al\u0131nmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini kaydetti.<\/p>\n

TCK 309 VE TCK 94 VURGUSU<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k itiraz\u0131nda iki \u00f6nemli su\u00e7 maddesine dikkat \u00e7ekti.<\/p>\n

\u0130snat edilen eylemlerin TCK\u2019n\u0131n 309. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen \u201cAnayasay\u0131 ihla<\/strong>l\u201d su\u00e7unun icrai hareketlerini olu\u015fturdu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n

Ayr\u0131ca ma\u011fdurlara y\u00f6nelik eylemlerin TCK\u2019n\u0131n 94. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen \u201ci\u015fkence<\/strong>\u201d su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi ve bu su\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131 savunuldu.<\/p>\n

Bu de\u011ferlendirmeler Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f<\/strong>\u0131n\u0131n itiraz gerek\u00e7eleri aras\u0131nda yer ald\u0131.<\/p>\n

ANADOLU 26. A\u011eIR CEZA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI KALDIRDI<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul Anadolu 26. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131 inceledi.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mahkeme, 2026\/503 De\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 dosyada 10 Temmuz 2026 tarihinde Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong>n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verdi.<\/p>\n

B\u00f6ylece Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi<\/strong>nin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle verdi\u011fi \u201cson soru\u015fturman\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d<\/strong> karar\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n kesin olarak verildi\u011fi bildirildi.<\/p>\n

DOSYA YEN\u0130DEN BAKIRK\u00d6Y 11. A\u011eIR CEZA MAHKEMES\u0130NDE<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul Anadolu 26. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi<\/strong>nin karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan dosya, gere\u011finin yerine getirilmesi amac\u0131yla yeniden Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi<\/strong>ne g\u00f6nderildi.<\/p>\n

Bundan sonraki a\u015famada Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi<\/strong> dosyay\u0131 verilen kesin kald\u0131rma karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda yeniden de\u011ferlendirecek.<\/p>\n

Bu a\u015famada \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f de\u011fil. Son soru\u015fturman\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar verilmesi halinde 2802 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun uyar\u0131nca esas yarg\u0131lama Yarg\u0131tay\u2019<\/strong>\u0131n ilgili ceza dairesinde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek.<\/p>\n

ET\u0130KETLER: #Ergenekon #Bak\u0131rk\u00f6yCumhuriyetBa\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 #Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y11A\u011f\u0131rCeza #\u0130stanbulAnadolu26A\u011f\u0131rCeza #FET\u00d6 #Zekeriya\u00d6z #HSK #Yarg\u0131tay #TCK309 #TCK94<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kamuoyunda \u201cErgenekon\u201d olarak bilinen soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturmalarda g\u00f6rev yapan 21 ihra\u00e7 h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki dosyada kritik bir geli\u015fme ya\u015fand\u0131. Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle verdi\u011fi \u201cson soru\u015fturman\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d karar\u0131, Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine \u0130stanbul Anadolu 26. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince kesin olarak kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Dosya yeniden Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderildi.\u00a0Read More<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

SON.TV\/\u0130STANBUL Kamuoyunda \u201cErgenekon\u201d olarak bilinen soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturmalarda g\u00f6rev yapan eski h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar hakk\u0131ndaki dosyada yarg\u0131 s\u00fcrecini yeniden hareketlendiren bir karar verildi. Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren \u0130stanbul Anadolu 26. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30 Mart 2026 tarihli zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 26. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 2026\/503 De\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u015f […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43514","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-haberler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43514"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43514\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}