{"id":42285,"date":"2026-09-02T22:05:19","date_gmt":"2026-09-02T22:05:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/02\/yargitaydan-iki-onemli-karar-nufus-kaydi-ve-ortakligin-giderilmesinde-emsal-nitelikte-bozma\/"},"modified":"2026-09-02T22:05:19","modified_gmt":"2026-09-02T22:05:19","slug":"yargitaydan-iki-onemli-karar-nufus-kaydi-ve-ortakligin-giderilmesinde-emsal-nitelikte-bozma","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/02\/yargitaydan-iki-onemli-karar-nufus-kaydi-ve-ortakligin-giderilmesinde-emsal-nitelikte-bozma\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay\u2019dan iki \u00f6nemli karar: N\u00fcfus kayd\u0131 ve ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesinde emsal nitelikte bozma!"},"content":{"rendered":"

SON.TV\/ANKARA<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sibel K\u0131z\u0131l\u015fu<\/strong> ve Ali Y\u0131ld\u0131z<\/strong>, ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 Emir\u2019in n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda 11 Mart 2011 olarak bulunan do\u011fum tarihinin d\u00fczeltilmesini istedi.<\/p>\n

Yerel mahkeme, talep edilen de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin davac\u0131 annenin eski evlili\u011fi d\u00f6nemine rastlad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bunun soyba\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden sorun olu\u015fturabilece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davay\u0131 reddetti. Karar taraflarca temyiz edilmeyince 10 Eyl\u00fcl 2013 tarihinde kesinle\u015fti.<\/p>\n

ADALET BAKANLI\u011eI KANUN YARARINA TEMY\u0130ZE G\u00d6T\u00dcRD\u00dc<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kesinle\u015fen karar daha sonra Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Hukuk \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz edildi.<\/p>\n

Dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi,<\/strong> n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesine ili\u015fkin davalar\u0131n kamu d\u00fczeniyle yak\u0131ndan ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011funa i\u015faret etti.<\/p>\n

Y\u00fcksek Daire,<\/strong> mahkemelerin herhangi bir ku\u015fkuya yer b\u0131rakmayacak bi\u00e7imde do\u011fru sicil olu\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn bulundu\u011funu belirtti.<\/p>\n

KEM\u0130K GRAF\u0130LER\u0130 VE SA\u011eLIK KURULU RAPORU DOSYADA<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong> incelemesinde, \u00e7ocu\u011fun tan\u0131ma yoluyla babas\u0131 olarak davac\u0131 Ali\u2019nin n\u00fcfusuna kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, tan\u0131man\u0131n ge\u00e7erlili\u011fini korudu\u011fu ve iptal edilmedi\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n

Dosyadaki do\u011fum belgeleri ve di\u011fer kay\u0131tlar \u00e7ocu\u011fun do\u011fum tarihinin 11 Mart 2011 oldu\u011funu g\u00f6sterirken, kemik grafileri \u00e7ekilerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen inceleme sonucunda d\u00fczenlenen 10 May\u0131s 2013 tarihli sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu raporunda \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n 20 ay ile uyumlu oldu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fi de kararda yer ald\u0131.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong>, ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan hukuki ve fiili durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda do\u011fum tarihinin d\u00fczeltilmesinin soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kendili\u011finden de\u011fi\u015ftirmeyece\u011fini de\u011ferlendirdi.<\/p>\n

DO\u011eRU N\u00dcFUS KAYDI OLU\u015eTURULMASI GEREK\u0130YOR<\/strong><\/p>\n

Y\u00fcksek Daire<\/strong> ayr\u0131ca ileride do\u011fabilecek muhtemel nesep ihtilaflar\u0131n\u0131n, n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fe uygun hale getirilmesine engel te\u015fkil etmeyece\u011fini belirtti.<\/p>\n

N\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi davalar\u0131n\u0131n kamu d\u00fczeniyle yak\u0131ndan ilgili oldu\u011funu vurgulayan Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi, mahkemelerin ger\u00e7e\u011fi ara\u015ft\u0131rarak do\u011fru sicili olu\u015fturma zorunlulu\u011fu bulundu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekti.<\/p>\n

Bu nedenle davan\u0131n kabul edilmesi gerekirken reddedilmesini usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulan Daire, Eski\u015fehir 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozdu.<\/p>\n

Karar, 14 May\u0131s 2026 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle verildi.<\/p>\n

YARGITAY 7. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130NDEN ORTAKLI\u011eIN G\u0130DER\u0130LMES\u0130 KARARI<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130kinci \u00f6nemli karar ise Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019<\/strong>nden \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131.<\/p>\n

Dairenin 2026\/2699 Esas, 2026\/2910 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda Darende Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131 incelendi.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 \u0130smet Ate\u015f<\/strong>, 135 ada 9 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerine baz\u0131 hissedarlar\u0131n bilgisi ve r\u0131zas\u0131yla yayla evi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n aynen taksim, bunun m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 halinde sat\u0131\u015f yoluyla giderilmesini talep etti.<\/p>\n

\u0130lk derece mahkemesi davay\u0131 kabul ederek ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k art\u0131rma yoluyla sat\u0131\u015f suretiyle giderilmesine karar verdi.<\/p>\n

51 B\u0130N 920 L\u0130RALIK MUHDESAT BEDEL\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde bulunan ve kararda kargir ev olarak belirtilen muhdesat\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan elde edilecek bedelden 51 bin 920 liran\u0131n \u0130smet Ate\u015f\u2019e \u00f6denmesine, kalan bedelin ise taraflara tapu kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilen paylar\u0131 oran\u0131nda da\u011f\u0131t\u0131lmas\u0131na h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n

Karar istinaf incelemesinden ge\u00e7meden kesinle\u015fti.<\/p>\n

Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong> bunun \u00fczerine karar\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz ederek dosyay\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong>\u2019a ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131.<\/p>\n

TARAF TE\u015eK\u0130L\u0130 SA\u011eLANMADAN KARAR VER\u0130LD\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong> incelemesinde \u00f6nemli usul eksiklikleri tespit etti.<\/p>\n

Kararda, daval\u0131lardan Oya K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7<\/strong>\u2019\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131na gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n davaya dahil edilmedi\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong>, payda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi davalar\u0131n\u0131n iki tarafl\u0131 ve taraflar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan benzer sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furan davalar oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekti.<\/p>\n

Daire, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 27. maddesi uyar\u0131nca davada b\u00fct\u00fcn payda\u015flar\u0131n yer almas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu oldu\u011funu, payda\u015flardan birinin \u00f6lmesi halinde ise miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesine g\u00f6re miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n davaya kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 sa\u011fland\u0131ktan sonra i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi gerekti\u011fini belirtti.<\/p>\n

KE\u015e\u0130F VE B\u0130L\u0130RK\u0130\u015e\u0130 \u0130NCELEMES\u0130 YAPILMALIYDI<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n tespit etti\u011fi bir di\u011fer eksiklik ise ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde mahallinde ke\u015fif yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 ve bilirki\u015fi raporu d\u00fczenlenmemesi oldu.<\/p>\n

Y\u00fcksek Daire,<\/strong> ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f yoluyla giderilmesi halinde ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde bina, a\u011fa\u00e7 ve benzeri b\u00fct\u00fcnleyici par\u00e7alar\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 durumunda bunlar\u0131n da arsa ile birlikte sat\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtti.<\/p>\n

Muhdesat\u0131n baz\u0131 payda\u015flara ait olmas\u0131 halinde ise arsa ile muhdesat de\u011ferlerinin ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 belirlenmesi gerekti\u011fi kaydedildi.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong> karar\u0131na g\u00f6re, arsan\u0131n ve muhdesat\u0131n de\u011ferleri belirlendikten sonra ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n toplam de\u011feri i\u00e7inde muhdesata isabet eden oran hesaplanmal\u0131; sat\u0131\u015f sonucunda elde edilen bedelin muhdesata kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelen b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc muhdesat sahibine, kalan k\u0131sm\u0131 ise payda\u015flara hisseleri oran\u0131nda da\u011f\u0131t\u0131lmal\u0131.<\/p>\n

MUHDESATIN DE\u011eER\u0130 AYRI AYRI TESP\u0130T ED\u0130LECEK<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong>, yerel mahkemenin \u00f6ncelikle Oya K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7<\/strong>\u2019\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 davaya dahil ederek taraf te\u015fkilini tamamlamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n

Ard\u0131ndan ta\u015f\u0131nmazda ke\u015fif yap\u0131lmas\u0131, bilirki\u015fiden rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve dava tarihi itibar\u0131yla arsa ile muhdesat de\u011ferlerinin ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 belirlenmesi gerekti\u011fini kaydetti.<\/p>\n

Bu de\u011ferler \u00fczerinden muhdesat\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n toplam de\u011ferine oran\u0131n\u0131n hesaplanmas\u0131 ve sat\u0131\u015f bedelinin de bu oran dikkate al\u0131narak payla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n

\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 KARAR DA KANUN YARARINA BOZULDU<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi,<\/strong> s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemler ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmeden eksik incelemeyle h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131n\u0131 do\u011fru bulmad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019<\/strong>n\u0131n HMK\u2019n\u0131n 363\/1. maddesine dayal\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz istemini kabul eden Daire, Darende Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n sonucuna etkili olmamak \u00fczere kanun yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131na karar verdi.<\/p>\n

Karar 3 Haziran 2026 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle al\u0131nd\u0131.<\/p>\n

KANUN YARARINA BOZMA HUKUK\u0130 SONUCU ORTADAN KALDIRMIYOR<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong>nin karar\u0131nda, HMK\u2019n\u0131n 363. maddesindeki kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz sisteminin kapsam\u0131na da yer verildi.<\/p>\n

Buna g\u00f6re kesin olarak verilen veya istinaf incelemesinden ge\u00e7meden kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bulunan kararlarda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmas\u0131 halinde Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulabiliyor.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong>\u2019\u0131n talebi yerinde g\u00f6rmesi halinde karar kanun yarar\u0131na bozuluyor. Ancak bu bozma, karar\u0131n taraflar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan daha \u00f6nce do\u011furdu\u011fu hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rm\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

ET\u0130KETLER: #Yarg\u0131tay #Yarg\u0131tay2HukukDairesi #Yarg\u0131tay7HukukDairesi #AdaletBakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 #KanunYarar\u0131naBozma #N\u00fcfusKayd\u0131 #Do\u011fumTarihi #Ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131nGiderilmesi #Muhdesat #Hukuk #Yarg\u0131 #SonTV<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi ile Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kanun yarar\u0131na temyize ta\u015f\u0131nan iki ayr\u0131 hukuk dosyas\u0131nda yerel mahkeme kararlar\u0131n\u0131 bozdu. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi, n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131ndaki do\u011fum tarihinin d\u00fczeltilmesi talebinde do\u011fru sicilin olu\u015fturulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekerken, Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi davas\u0131nda taraf te\u015fkili, ke\u015fif, bilirki\u015fi incelemesi ve muhdesat de\u011ferinin belirlenmesine ili\u015fkin \u00f6nemli tespitlerde bulundu.<\/p>\n

SON.TV\/ANKARA<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n 2026 y\u0131l\u0131nda verdi\u011fi iki ayr\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozma karar\u0131nda, ilk derece mahkemelerinin kesinle\u015fmi\u015f h\u00fck\u00fcmleri mercek alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 363. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz ba\u015fvurular\u0131 \u00fczerine dosyalar\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay, iki kararda da h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

N\u00dcFUS KAYDINDA DO\u011eRU S\u0130C\u0130L VURGUSU<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2026\/4751 Esas, 2026\/5580 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131na konu dava, n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131ndaki do\u011fum tarihinin d\u00fczeltilmesi talebine ili\u015fkin oldu.<\/p>\n

Eski\u015fehir 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nde g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada\u00a0Read More<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

SON.TV\/ANKARA Sibel K\u0131z\u0131l\u015fu ve Ali Y\u0131ld\u0131z, ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 Emir\u2019in n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda 11 Mart 2011 olarak bulunan do\u011fum tarihinin d\u00fczeltilmesini istedi. Yerel mahkeme, talep edilen de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin davac\u0131 annenin eski evlili\u011fi d\u00f6nemine rastlad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bunun soyba\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden sorun olu\u015fturabilece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davay\u0131 reddetti. Karar taraflarca temyiz edilmeyince 10 Eyl\u00fcl 2013 tarihinde kesinle\u015fti. ADALET BAKANLI\u011eI KANUN YARARINA TEMY\u0130ZE G\u00d6T\u00dcRD\u00dc Kesinle\u015fen […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-haberler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42285"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42285\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}