{"id":40896,"date":"2026-08-18T21:31:03","date_gmt":"2026-08-18T21:31:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/2026\/08\/18\/yargitaydan-kiracilari-ilgilendiren-karar-davanin-adi-degil-hukuki-niteligi-esas-alinacak\/"},"modified":"2026-08-18T21:31:03","modified_gmt":"2026-08-18T21:31:03","slug":"yargitaydan-kiracilari-ilgilendiren-karar-davanin-adi-degil-hukuki-niteligi-esas-alinacak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/2026\/08\/18\/yargitaydan-kiracilari-ilgilendiren-karar-davanin-adi-degil-hukuki-niteligi-esas-alinacak\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay\u2019dan kirac\u0131lar\u0131 ilgilendiren karar: Davan\u0131n ad\u0131 de\u011fil hukuki niteli\u011fi esas al\u0131nacak"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s1\">SON.TV\/ANKARA<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s2\">Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesinin fazla \u00f6dendi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen kira bedellerinin iadesine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131, 19 A\u011fustos 2026 tarihli ve 33345 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mland\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\"><strong>Daire, Polatl\u0131 2. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesin<\/strong>in davay\u0131 yaln\u0131zca \u201c<strong>istirdat davas\u0131\u201d<\/strong> olarak de\u011ferlendirip reddetmesini usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 buldu. \u0130lk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131, <strong>Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131<\/strong>n ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine kanun yarar\u0131na bozuldu.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s1\">K\u0130RACI FAZLA \u00d6DED\u0130\u011e\u0130 K\u0130RA BEDEL\u0130N\u0130 \u0130STED\u0130<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Davaya konu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, <strong>3 A\u011fustos 2022<\/strong> ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihli kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynakland\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Davac\u0131 kirac\u0131n\u0131n avukat\u0131, kira bedellerinin ev sahibinin e\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan bildirilen hesaba \u00f6dendi\u011fini, taraflar aras\u0131nda fiilen ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen art\u0131\u015f oran\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fczde 15 oldu\u011funu belirtti.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Ancak ev sahibinin daha sonra ekonomik gerek\u00e7eler ile tahliye ve elektrik kesme tehdidinde bulunarak hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde s\u00fcrekli kira art\u0131\u015f\u0131 talep etti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Kirac\u0131, A\u011fustos 2024 kira bedelinin \u00f6denmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla usuls\u00fcz tebligata dayal\u0131 tahliye talepli icra takibi ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, uzun s\u00fcredir tahsil edilen kira bedellerinin daha sonra \u201c<strong>kiraya veren de\u011filim\u201d<\/strong> denilerek kabul edilmedi\u011fini savundu.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s1\">9 B\u0130N 822 L\u0130RANIN \u0130ADES\u0130 TALEP ED\u0130LD\u0130<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Kirac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan \u00f6demelerin ev sahibi taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmemesi \u00fczerine alacakl\u0131n\u0131n temerr\u00fcde d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve tevdi yeri tayin edildi\u011fi belirtildi.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Davac\u0131, Kas\u0131m 2024\u2019e kadar yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6demeler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ev sahibine toplam 9 bin 822 lira fazla \u00f6deme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc. Bu tutar\u0131n 15 Ekim 2024 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faiziyle birlikte geri \u00f6denmesini talep etti.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Daval\u0131 taraf ise davan\u0131n s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve \u00f6demelerin r\u0131zaen yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istedi.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s1\">\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 DAVAYI REDDETT\u0130<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\"><strong>Polatl\u0131 2. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi, istirdat davas\u0131<\/strong> a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6demenin kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bir icra takibi kapsam\u0131nda ve cebr\u00ee icra tehdidi alt\u0131nda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine i\u015faret etti.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Mahkeme, davac\u0131n\u0131n iadesini istedi\u011fi son \u00f6demenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 15 Ekim 2024 tarihinde hen\u00fcz \u00f6deme emri kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi ve kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bir icra takibi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle <strong>\u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu<\/strong>\u2019nun 72\u2019nci maddesindeki istirdat davas\u0131 \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Bu gerek\u00e7eyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verildi.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s1\">ADALET BAKANLI\u011eI KANUN YARARINA TEMY\u0130ZE BA\u015eVURDU<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Kesin nitelikteki karar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan <strong>Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong> dosyay\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz yoluyla Yarg\u0131taya ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvurusunda, h\u00e2kimin taraflar\u0131n ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc maddi vak\u0131alarla ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu ancak bu vak\u0131alar\u0131n hukuki nitelendirmesini resen yapmakla g\u00f6revli bulundu\u011fu belirtildi.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Kirac\u0131n\u0131n talebinin<strong> \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019nun 72\u2019nci<\/strong> <strong>maddesi<\/strong> kapsam\u0131nda bir istirdat davas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, fazla \u00f6dendi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen kira bedellerinin tahsiline y\u00f6nelik bir alacak davas\u0131 niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edildi.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s1\">YARGITAY: HUKUK\u0130 N\u0130TELEND\u0130RME H\u00c2K\u0130M\u0130N G\u00d6REV\u0130D\u0130R<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s2\">Dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 33\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fc maddesine dikkat \u00e7ekti.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Daire, taraflar\u0131n yaln\u0131zca maddi vak\u0131alar\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011funu; bu vak\u0131alar\u0131n hukuki nitelendirmesini yapmak ve uygulanacak hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131 belirlemekle h\u00e2kimin g\u00f6revli bulundu\u011funu vurgulad\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Kararda, h\u00e2kimin ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen olaylar\u0131n hukuki sebebini kendili\u011finden belirlemekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ifade edildi.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131n\u0131n tam metnine <a href=\"https:\/\/higm.adalet.gov.tr\/Resimler\/SayfaDokuman\/20260816202559365Taraflar%C4%B1n%20Yaln%C4%B1zca%20Maddi%20Vak%C4%B1alar%C4%B1%20%C4%B0leri%20S%C3%BCrmekle%20Y%C3%BCk%C3%BCml%C3%BC%20Olup%20Bu%20Vak%C4%B1alar%C4%B1n%20Hukuki%20Tavsifini%20Yap%C4%B1p%20Uygulanacak%20Hukuk%20Kurallar%C4%B1n%C4%B1%20Belirlemenin%20H%C3%A2kimin%20G%C3%B6revi%20Oldu%C4%9Fu.pdf\">Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Hukuk \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn yay\u0131mlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belgeden<\/a>\u2060 ula\u015f\u0131labiliyor.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s1\">DAVACININ KULLANDI\u011eI \u0130FADE MAHKEMEY\u0130 BA\u011eLAMAZ<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\"><strong>Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong>, somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta davac\u0131n\u0131n talebinin kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bir icra takibi kapsam\u0131nda cebr\u00ee icra tehdidiyle \u00f6denen paran\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirledi.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Talebin, kira ili\u015fkisi kapsam\u0131nda hukuki bir sebep bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n fazla tahsil edildi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen kira bedellerinin iadesine y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu kaydedildi.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Davac\u0131n\u0131n dilek\u00e7esinde talebini \u201c<strong>istirdat<\/strong>\u201d olarak adland\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131n mahkemeyi ba\u011flamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten <strong>Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong>, istemin hukuki niteli\u011finin h\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan belirlenmesi gerekti\u011fine h\u00fckmetti.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s1\">UYU\u015eMAZLI\u011eIN ESASI \u0130NCELENMEL\u0130YD\u0130<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s2\">Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi, kirac\u0131n\u0131n talebinin \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019nun 72\u2019nci maddesiyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesini do\u011fru bulmad\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Fazla \u00f6dendi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen kira bedellerinin iadesine y\u00f6nelik talebin, sebepsiz zenginle\u015fme ve fazla \u00f6demenin iadesine ili\u015fkin genel h\u00fck\u00fcmler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde bir alacak davas\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtildi.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Bu nedenle ilk derece mahkemesinin taraflar\u0131n delillerini de\u011ferlendirerek uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda karar vermesi gerekirken, istirdat davas\u0131n\u0131n \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davay\u0131 reddetmesinin usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa karar verildi.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s1\">9 B\u0130N 822 L\u0130RALIK DAVAYA 18 B\u0130N L\u0130RA VEK\u00c2LET \u00dcCRET\u0130<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s2\">Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131nda vek\u00e2let \u00fccreti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan hata da ele al\u0131nd\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Dava de\u011ferinin 9 bin 822 lira olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen daval\u0131 lehine 18 bin lira vek\u00e2let \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedildi\u011fi belirlendi.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\"><strong>Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme,<\/strong> karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifesi uyar\u0131nca vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin reddedilen dava de\u011ferini a\u015famayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulad\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Dava de\u011ferinin \u00fczerinde vek\u00e2let \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesi de ayr\u0131ca usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s1\">KARAR OY B\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE BOZULDU<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s2\">Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz istemini kabul etti.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s2\">Polatl\u0131 2. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2 Temmuz 2025 tarihli ve 2025\/248 esas, 2025\/626 karar say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 363\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi uyar\u0131nca kanun yarar\u0131na bozuldu.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s2\">Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n 2026\/3039 esas ve 2026\/2767 karar say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc, 5 May\u0131s 2026 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle al\u0131nd\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s1\">K\u0130RA DAVALARINDA \u00d6NEML\u0130 HUKUK\u0130 \u0130LKE<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Karar, bir davan\u0131n sonucunun taraflar\u0131n dilek\u00e7ede kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava ad\u0131yla de\u011fil, ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen maddi olaylar ve talebin ger\u00e7ek hukuki niteli\u011fi \u00fczerinden belirlenmesi gerekti\u011fini ortaya koydu.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Buna g\u00f6re mahkeme, davac\u0131n\u0131n talebini hatal\u0131 veya eksik bi\u00e7imde adland\u0131rmas\u0131yla ba\u011fl\u0131 kalamayacak. H\u00e2kim, anlat\u0131lan olaylar\u0131 ve talep sonucunu inceleyerek uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kural\u0131n\u0131 kendili\u011finden belirleyecek.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\">Karar do\u011frudan fazla \u00f6dendi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen kira bedellerinin iadesine ili\u015fkin olsa da h\u00e2kimin hukuki nitelendirme g\u00f6revi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan hukuk davalar\u0131n\u0131n geneline y\u00f6nelik \u00f6nemli bir ilkeyi yeniden teyit ediyor.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><strong><span class=\"s1\">ET\u0130KETLER:<\/span><span class=\"s2\"> #Yarg\u0131tay #kirac\u0131 #evsahibi #kirabedeli #fazla\u00f6denenkira #kirahukuku #istirdatdavas\u0131 #sebepsizzenginle\u015fme #vek\u00e2let\u00fccreti #AdaletBakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 #Resm\u00eeGazete<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi, kirac\u0131n\u0131n fazla \u00f6dedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kira bedelinin iadesi i\u00e7in a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada \u00f6nemli bir karara imza att\u0131. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, taraflar\u0131n kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 hukuki nitelendirmenin h\u00e2kimi ba\u011flamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, maddi vak\u0131alara uygulanacak hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131 belirlemenin h\u00e2kimin g\u00f6revi oldu\u011funu vurgulad\u0131.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.son.tv\/yargitaydan-kiracilari-ilgilendiren-karar-davanin-adi-degil-hukuki-niteligi-esas-alinacak\/\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"feedzy-rss-link-icon\">Read More<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SON.TV\/ANKARA Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesinin fazla \u00f6dendi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen kira bedellerinin iadesine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131, 19 A\u011fustos 2026 tarihli ve 33345 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mland\u0131. Daire, Polatl\u0131 2. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin davay\u0131 yaln\u0131zca \u201cistirdat davas\u0131\u201d olarak de\u011ferlendirip reddetmesini usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 buldu. \u0130lk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine kanun yarar\u0131na bozuldu. K\u0130RACI FAZLA [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40896","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-haberler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40896","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40896"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40896\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}