K\u0131r\u015fehir\u2019<\/strong>de 2019 y\u0131l\u0131nda meydana gelen k\u00f6pek sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131nda son s\u00f6z\u00fc Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong> s\u00f6yledi. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme<\/strong>, hayvan bulunduran ki\u015filerin \u00e7evre g\u00fcvenli\u011fini sa\u011flamak ve hayvanlar\u0131n ba\u015fkalar\u0131na zarar vermesini \u00f6nlemek i\u00e7in gerekli tedbirleri almakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekti.K\u00f6peklerin tasma ve zincir gibi g\u00fcvenlik \u00f6nlemleri al\u0131nmadan serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6zen ve g\u00f6zetim y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlali olarak de\u011ferlendiren Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi,<\/strong> yerel mahkemenin tazminat karar\u0131n\u0131 hukuka uygun buldu.<\/p>\n KIZINI SERV\u0130SE B\u0130ND\u0130R\u0130P EV\u0130NE D\u00d6N\u00dcYORDU<\/strong><\/p>\n Olay, 10 Ocak 2019<\/strong> g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 07.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda K\u0131r\u015fehir<\/strong>\u2019in Boztepe<\/strong> il\u00e7esinde meydana geldi. O tarihte 63 ya\u015f\u0131nda oldu\u011fu belirtilen Sebahat Karaman,<\/strong> k\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 okul servisine bindirdikten sonra evine do\u011fru yola \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131.<\/p>\n Bu s\u0131rada Karaman<\/strong>\u2019a s\u00fcr\u00fc h\u00e2linde dola\u015fan k\u00f6pekler sald\u0131rd\u0131. Kom\u015fular\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcdahalesiyle kurtar\u0131lan kad\u0131n, olay yerine \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lan ambulansla hastaneye kald\u0131r\u0131larak tedavi alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131.<\/p>\n KULA\u011eINDA VE KOLLARINDA DOKU KAYBI OLU\u015eTU<\/strong><\/p>\n Sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n Sebahat Karaman<\/strong>\u2019\u0131n v\u00fccudunda a\u011f\u0131r ve kal\u0131c\u0131 hasara yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirlendi. Karaman\u2019\u0131n sa\u011f kulak kep\u00e7esi ile kulak memesinin bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde ve her iki kolunda doku kayb\u0131 meydana geldi.<\/p>\n Mahkeme dosyas\u0131na yans\u0131yan tespitlerde yaralanmalar\u0131n basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahaleyle giderilebilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay\u0131n Karaman<\/strong>\u2019\u0131n ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 tehlikeye soktu\u011fu belirtildi. Y\u00fcz b\u00f6lgesindeki lezyonlar ile sa\u011f kulak kep\u00e7esindeki k\u0131smi doku kayb\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fczde sabit iz niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirildi.<\/p>\n Haz\u0131rlanan bilirki\u015fi raporunda Karaman<\/strong>\u2019\u0131n maluliyet oran\u0131 y\u00fczde 37 olarak belirlendi.<\/p>\n K\u00d6PEK SAH\u0130PLER\u0130NE TAZM\u0130NAT DAVASI A\u00c7TI<\/strong><\/p>\n Tedavisinin ard\u0131ndan k\u00f6peklerin sahiplerinden \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olan Karaman, u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bedensel ve manevi zararlar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n K\u0131r\u015fehir 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019<\/strong>nde g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada bilirki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hesaplamada, Karaman\u2019<\/strong>\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 ayl\u0131k ge\u00e7ici i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik zarar\u0131 6 bin 62 lira 70 kuru\u015f, s\u00fcrekli i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik zarar\u0131 ise 431 bin 193 lira 50 kuru\u015f olarak hesapland\u0131.<\/p>\n Mahkeme, iki kalemin toplam\u0131 olan 437 bin 156 lira 20 kuru\u015f maddi tazminat\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra Karaman\u2019a 200 bin lira manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verdi. B\u00f6ylece yaln\u0131zca Karaman i\u00e7in h\u00fckmedilen tazminat 637 bin 156 lira 20 kuru\u015fa ula\u015ft\u0131.<\/strong><\/p>\n Karaman\u2019\u0131n e\u015fine 30 bin lira, di\u011fer iki yak\u0131n\u0131na ise 10\u2019ar bin lira manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesi de kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Bu \u00f6demelerle birlikte dosyada h\u00fckmedilen toplam tazminat 687 bin 156 lira 20 kuru\u015f oldu. Tazminatlar\u0131n olay tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faiziyle daval\u0131lardan tahsil edilmesine h\u00fckmedildi.<\/strong><\/p>\n MAHKEME \u201cKUSURSUZ SORUMLULUK\u201d H\u00dcKM\u00dcN\u00dc UYGULADI<\/strong><\/p>\n Yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131, T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu\u2019nun \u201chayvan bulunduran\u0131n sorumlulu\u011fu\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 67\u2019nci maddesine dayand\u0131rd\u0131.<\/strong><\/p>\n S\u00f6z konusu d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re bir hayvan\u0131n bak\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 ve y\u00f6netimini \u00fcstlenen ki\u015fi, hayvan\u0131n verdi\u011fi zarar\u0131 gidermekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc tutuluyor. Hayvan bulunduran ki\u015fi, ancak zarar\u0131n do\u011fmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek i\u00e7in gerekli b\u00fct\u00fcn \u00f6zeni g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini veya gerekli \u00f6zen g\u00f6sterilse dahi zarar\u0131n \u00f6nlenemeyece\u011fini ispatlayabilirse sorumluluktan kurtulabiliyor.<\/p>\n Bu d\u00fczenleme hukukta \u201cola\u011fan sebep sorumlulu\u011fu\u201d<\/strong> veya uygulamadaki yayg\u0131n ifadeyle \u201ckusursuz sorumluluk\u201d<\/strong> kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendiriliyor. Ba\u015fka bir ifadeyle zarar g\u00f6ren ki\u015finin, hayvan sahibinin ayr\u0131ca kusurlu bir hareketini kan\u0131tlamas\u0131 her durumda aranm\u0131yor; hayvan ile meydana gelen zarar aras\u0131ndaki ba\u011flant\u0131 ve kanundaki sorumluluk \u015fartlar\u0131 \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131yor.<\/p>\n \u0130ST\u0130NAF BA\u015eVURUSU REDDED\u0130LD\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n Daval\u0131lar, K\u0131r\u015fehir 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/strong>\u2019nin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurdu. Dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 24. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong>, ba\u015fvuruyu esastan reddetti.<\/p>\n Bunun \u00fczerine karar temyiz edilerek Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong>\u2019a ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131. Dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi,<\/strong> hayvan bulunduran ki\u015filerin hayvanlar\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere zarar vermesini \u00f6nleyecek tedbirleri almak ve gerekli \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermek zorunda oldu\u011funu vurgulad\u0131.<\/p>\n TASMA VE Z\u0130NC\u0130RS\u0130Z BIRAKMAK Y\u00dcK\u00dcML\u00dcL\u00dcK \u0130HLAL\u0130 SAYILDI<\/strong><\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong>, daval\u0131lar\u0131n bak\u0131m ve g\u00f6zetimindeki k\u00f6peklerin tasma ve zincir gibi gerekli \u00f6nlemler al\u0131nmadan, \u00e7evre g\u00fcvenli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tehlike olu\u015fturacak bi\u00e7imde serbest\u00e7e dola\u015fmalar\u0131na izin verilmesini \u00f6zen ve g\u00f6zetim y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlali olarak de\u011ferlendirdi.<\/p>\n Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme,<\/strong> hayvan bulunduran ki\u015finin sorumluluktan kurtulabilmesi i\u00e7in zarar\u0131 \u00f6nlemeye y\u00f6nelik gerekli b\u00fct\u00fcn tedbirleri ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya bu tedbirler al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olsa bile olay\u0131n \u00f6nlenemeyece\u011fini ispatlamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine i\u015faret etti.<\/p>\n \u201cSOPAYLA KI\u015eKIRTTI\u201d SAVUNMASI KABUL ED\u0130LMED\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n Daval\u0131lar temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda, Sebahat Karaman<\/strong>\u2019\u0131n elindeki sopay\u0131 sallayarak k\u00f6pekleri k\u0131\u015fk\u0131rtt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc. Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong> bu savunmay\u0131 yerinde bulmad\u0131.<\/p>\n Karaman<\/strong>\u2019\u0131n sabah saatlerinde d\u0131\u015far\u0131da bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n ve sald\u0131r\u0131y\u0131 engellemek amac\u0131yla elindeki sopay\u0131 kendisini koruma i\u00e7g\u00fcd\u00fcs\u00fcyle kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n, olay ile zarar aras\u0131ndaki illiyet ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kesecek nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi.<\/p>\n Ba\u015fka bir anlat\u0131mla Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong>, sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011frayan ki\u015finin kendisini korumaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 hayvan sahiplerinin sorumlulu\u011funu ortadan kald\u0131ran bir davran\u0131\u015f olarak kabul etmedi.<\/p>\n KARAR OY B\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE ONANDI<\/strong><\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi,<\/strong> dosyadaki bilirki\u015fi raporunu denetime elveri\u015fli, h\u00fckmedilen manevi tazminat\u0131 ise hakkaniyete uygun buldu. Daval\u0131lar\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 reddedilerek Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 24. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong>nin karar\u0131 oy birli\u011fiyle onand\u0131.<\/p>\n B\u00f6ylece Sebahat Karaman<\/strong>\u2019\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131k yedi y\u0131l s\u00fcren hukuk m\u00fccadelesi tamamland\u0131 ve tazminat h\u00fckm\u00fc kesinle\u015fti. Karaman<\/strong>, karar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada adaletin yerini buldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi ve benzer sald\u0131r\u0131lara u\u011frayan ki\u015filere haklar\u0131n\u0131 aramalar\u0131 \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131nda bulundu.<\/p>\n HER K\u00d6PEK SALDIRISINDA AYNI TAZM\u0130NAT MI \u00d6DEN\u0130R?<\/strong><\/p>\n Karar, k\u00f6pek ve di\u011fer hayvanlar\u0131 bulunduran ki\u015filerin bak\u0131m, denetim ve \u00e7evre g\u00fcvenli\u011fine ili\u015fkin sorumluluklar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bi\u00e7imde ortaya koyuyor. Ancak h\u00fckmedilen 637 bin 156 lira 20 kuru\u015fluk tutar, her k\u00f6pek sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131nda otomatik olarak uygulanacak sabit bir bedel de\u011fil.<\/p>\n Tazminat miktar\u0131 her somut olayda yaralanman\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131, ge\u00e7ici ve s\u00fcrekli i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik s\u00fcresi, maluliyet oran\u0131, tedavi giderleri, taraflar\u0131n ekonomik ve sosyal durumlar\u0131, kusur veya illiyet de\u011ferlendirmesi ve manevi zarar\u0131n boyutu dikkate al\u0131narak belirleniyor.<\/p>\n Bu nedenle karar\u0131n \u00f6nemi yaln\u0131zca tazminat miktar\u0131ndan de\u011fil; hayvanlar\u0131n g\u00fcvenlik tedbirleri al\u0131nmadan serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n sahipleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ciddi bir hukuki sorumluluk do\u011furdu\u011funun Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya konulmas\u0131ndan kaynaklan\u0131yor.<\/p>\n ET\u0130KETLER:#Yarg\u0131tay #K\u00f6pekSald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 #Tazminat #Sald\u0131rganK\u00f6pek #K\u0131r\u015fehir #SebahatKaraman #Hukuk #EmsalKarar #HayvanSahipleri #SonDakika<\/strong><\/p>\n K\u0131r\u015fehir\u2019de k\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 okul servisine bindirdikten sonra evine d\u00f6nerken k\u00f6peklerin sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131na u\u011frayan Sebahat Karaman\u2019\u0131n y\u0131llar s\u00fcren hukuk m\u00fccadelesi sonu\u00e7land\u0131. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi, y\u00fczde 37 oran\u0131nda malul kalan Karaman\u2019a 437 bin 156 lira 20 kuru\u015f maddi ve 200 bin lira manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131 oy birli\u011fiyle onad\u0131.\u00a0Read More<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u00a0 SON.TV\/ANKARA K\u0131r\u015fehir\u2019de 2019 y\u0131l\u0131nda meydana gelen k\u00f6pek sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131nda son s\u00f6z\u00fc Yarg\u0131tay s\u00f6yledi. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, hayvan bulunduran ki\u015filerin \u00e7evre g\u00fcvenli\u011fini sa\u011flamak ve hayvanlar\u0131n ba\u015fkalar\u0131na zarar vermesini \u00f6nlemek i\u00e7in gerekli tedbirleri almakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekti.K\u00f6peklerin tasma ve zincir gibi g\u00fcvenlik \u00f6nlemleri al\u0131nmadan serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6zen ve g\u00f6zetim y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlali olarak de\u011ferlendiren […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":40533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40532","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-haberler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40532","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40532"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40532\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40532"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40532"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40532"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.son.tv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/IMG_4885-300x169.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.son.tv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/IMG_4526-300x160.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n