{"id":40387,"date":"2026-08-11T21:17:45","date_gmt":"2026-08-11T21:17:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/2026\/08\/11\/yargitaydan-ev-alacaklari-sevindiren-karar-tapu-sahibinin-iyi-niyet-savunmasi-kabul-edilmedi\/"},"modified":"2026-08-11T21:17:45","modified_gmt":"2026-08-11T21:17:45","slug":"yargitaydan-ev-alacaklari-sevindiren-karar-tapu-sahibinin-iyi-niyet-savunmasi-kabul-edilmedi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/2026\/08\/11\/yargitaydan-ev-alacaklari-sevindiren-karar-tapu-sahibinin-iyi-niyet-savunmasi-kabul-edilmedi\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay\u2019dan ev alacaklar\u0131 sevindiren karar: Tapu sahibinin \u201ciyi niyet\u201d savunmas\u0131 kabul edilmedi!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>SON.TV\/ANKARA<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay, ayn\u0131 konutun birden fazla ki\u015fiye sat\u0131lmas\u0131 ya da tapusunun daha sonra ba\u015fka bir ki\u015fiye devredilmesi nedeniyle ya\u015fanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara ili\u015fkin dikkat \u00e7eken bir karara imza att\u0131. Yarg\u0131tay 6. Hukuk Dairesi, y\u00fckleniciden sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 daireyi fiilen teslim alarak kullanmaya ba\u015flayan t\u00fcketici lehine verilen tapu iptali ve tescil karar\u0131n\u0131 onad\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131 sonradan devralan ki\u015finin ta\u015f\u0131nmazda ba\u015fka birinin oturdu\u011funu bilmesi veya durumun gerektirdi\u011fi \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermesi h\u00e2linde bunu \u00f6\u011frenebilecek konumda bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n \u201ciyi niyet\u201d de\u011ferlendirmesinde dikkate al\u0131nabilece\u011fini ortaya koydu.<\/p>\n<p>Karar\u0131n k\u00fcnyesi Yarg\u0131tay 6. Hukuk Dairesi, 2025\/2811 Esas, 2026\/1813 Karar olarak a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131. Karar 30 Nisan 2026 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle verildi.<\/p>\n<p><strong>DA\u0130RE 2013 YILINDA TESL\u0130M ED\u0130LD\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dava dosyas\u0131ndaki bilgilere g\u00f6re t\u00fcketici, arsa pay\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 in\u015faat s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi kapsam\u0131nda y\u00fckleniciye d\u00fc\u015fen dairelerden birini sat\u0131n ald\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Kas\u0131m 2013\u2019te fiilen teslim edildi. Al\u0131c\u0131, Aral\u0131k 2013\u2019te ailesiyle birlikte daireye ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131; do\u011falgaz aboneli\u011fini a\u00e7t\u0131rd\u0131 ve adres kayd\u0131n\u0131 yeni konutuna ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Ancak al\u0131c\u0131, bedelini \u00f6dedi\u011fini belirtti\u011fi dairenin tapusunu alamad\u0131. Y\u00fcklenici, tapu devri taleplerine ra\u011fmen t\u00fcketiciyi oyalad\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 daha sonra dairenin tapuda ba\u015fka bir ki\u015fiye devredildi\u011fini \u00f6\u011frendi.<\/p>\n<p><strong>AYNI B\u0130NADAN \u00dc\u00c7 DA\u0130RE TEK G\u00dcNDE DEVRED\u0130LD\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131, ayn\u0131 binadaki \u00fc\u00e7 dairenin 28 Ocak 2014 tarihinde y\u00fckleniciyle ticari ili\u015fkisi bulunan bir ki\u015fiye devredildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc.<\/p>\n<p>Devirlerin ayn\u0131 tarihte ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n de\u011ferinden d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck bedelle sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 ve taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ticari ili\u015fki davac\u0131n\u0131n muvazaa iddias\u0131n\u0131n temelini olu\u015fturdu.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131, tapuyu sonradan devralan ki\u015finin de in\u015faat ve emlak i\u015fiyle u\u011fra\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, y\u00fcklenicilerle ortak ticari faaliyetlerde bulundu\u011funu ve dairede kendisinin ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildi\u011fini savundu.<\/p>\n<p>Tapu devrinin ger\u00e7ek bir sat\u0131\u015f olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisinden mal ka\u00e7\u0131rmak amac\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcren t\u00fcketici, tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptal edilerek dairenin kendi ad\u0131na tescil edilmesini istedi.<\/p>\n<p><strong>DAVALI \u201cSATI\u015eTAN HABER\u0130M YOKTU\u201d DED\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Tapuyu devralan daval\u0131 ise ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 tapu malikinden sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n daireyi daha \u00f6nce sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini ve y\u00fckleniciler taraf\u0131ndan kendisinin de ma\u011fdur edildi\u011fini savundu.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131, muvazaal\u0131 hareket etti\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n somut delile dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddini talep etti.<\/p>\n<p>Ancak dava s\u0131ras\u0131nda taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ticari ba\u011flant\u0131lar, tapu devirlerinin \u015fekli, tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n fiil\u00ee kullan\u0131m durumu incelendi.<\/p>\n<p><strong>T\u00dcKET\u0130C\u0130 MAHKEMES\u0130 TAPUNUN \u0130PTAL\u0130NE KARAR VERD\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Davay\u0131 g\u00f6ren \u015eanl\u0131urfa 1. T\u00fcketici Mahkemesi, t\u00fcketicinin 2013 y\u0131l\u0131ndan itibaren s\u00f6z konusu dairede oturdu\u011funun tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ve abonelik kay\u0131tlar\u0131yla do\u011fruland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirledi.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca y\u00fcklenici ile tapuyu devralan daval\u0131 aras\u0131nda ticari ili\u015fki bulundu\u011funu tespit etti.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131n\u0131n daireyi g\u00f6rmeden sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki beyan\u0131n\u0131 hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulan mahkeme, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz devrinin muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Bu gerek\u00e7elerle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptal edilerek ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn ilk al\u0131c\u0131 ad\u0131na tesciline karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u0130ST\u0130NAF MAHKEMES\u0130 DE T\u00dcKET\u0130C\u0130Y\u0130 HAKLI BULDU<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yerel mahkemenin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusu yap\u0131ld\u0131. Dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Gaziantep B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Hukuk Dairesi de ilk al\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n tapu devrinden \u00f6nce daireye yerle\u015fti\u011fini belirledi.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130stinaf karar\u0131nda, do\u011falgaz aboneli\u011finin 9 Eyl\u00fcl 2013 tarihinde ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekildi. Tapuyu sonradan alan daval\u0131n\u0131n da polis merkezindeki ifadesinde, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte davac\u0131n\u0131n dairede oturdu\u011funu kabul etti\u011fi aktar\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi, malik s\u0131fat\u0131yla \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir ki\u015finin ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dairenin sat\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131nda hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmesinde bulundu.<\/p>\n<p>Tapuyu devralan ki\u015finin iyi niyetli say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 ve devrin muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015fan mahkeme, istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 esastan reddetti.<\/p>\n<p><strong>YARGITAY TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 KARARINI ONADI<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dosyan\u0131n temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Yarg\u0131tay 6. Hukuk Dairesinin \u00f6n\u00fcne geldi.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u201cy\u00fckleniciden temlik al\u0131nan \u015fahsi hakka dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil istemi\u201d olarak nitelendirdi.<\/p>\n<p>Daire, taraflar\u0131n iddia ve savunmalar\u0131, dosyaya sunulan belgeler, yarg\u0131lama ve ispat kurallar\u0131 ile istinaf karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eler do\u011frultusunda karar\u0131n usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen itirazlar\u0131 karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli g\u00f6rmeyen Yarg\u0131tay, Gaziantep B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 onad\u0131. B\u00f6ylece tapunun iptal edilerek ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ilk al\u0131c\u0131 ad\u0131na tescil edilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fme s\u00fcrecinde \u00f6nemli bir a\u015famay\u0131 tamamlad\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Karar oy birli\u011fiyle al\u0131nd\u0131.<\/p>\n<p><strong>B\u0130R TEMY\u0130Z BA\u015eVURUSU S\u00dcRE A\u015eIMINDAN REDDED\u0130LD\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dosyada daval\u0131lardan biri taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan temyiz ba\u015fvurusu ise esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmedi.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili daval\u0131n\u0131n vekiline 30 Haziran 2025 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini belirledi. Daha sonra karar\u0131n yeni vekile yeniden tebli\u011f edilmesinin temyiz s\u00fcresi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yeni veya ek bir hak do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmedildi.<\/p>\n<p>Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019na g\u00f6re iki haftal\u0131k temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi i\u00e7in bu daval\u0131n\u0131n temyiz dilek\u00e7esi s\u00fcreden reddedildi.<\/p>\n<p><strong>TAPU KAYDI HER DURUMDA KORUMA SA\u011eLAMIYOR<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu\u2019nun 1023\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi, tapu siciline iyi niyetle dayanarak ayni hak kazanan ki\u015filerin kazan\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 kural olarak koruyor.<\/p>\n<p>Ancak iyi niyet korumas\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z de\u011fil. Bir ki\u015finin hakk\u0131 kazan\u0131rken tapu kayd\u0131ndaki hukuki sorunlar\u0131 bildi\u011fi veya gerekli \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermesi h\u00e2linde bilebilecek durumda oldu\u011fu kan\u0131tlan\u0131rsa iyi niyet iddias\u0131 kabul edilmeyebiliyor.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130ncelenen olayda da dairenin ilk al\u0131c\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tapu devrinden \u00f6nce kullan\u0131lmaya ba\u015flanmas\u0131, aboneliklerin a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131, sonradan tapuyu alan ki\u015finin bu durumu kabul eden ifadesi ve y\u00fckleniciyle aras\u0131ndaki ticari ili\u015fki birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemeler, somut olay\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn \u00f6zellikleri kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda tapuyu sonradan alan ki\u015finin iyi niyetli say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n<p><strong>KARAR HER AD\u0130 YAZILI S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMEY\u0130 GE\u00c7ERL\u0130 H\u00c2LE GET\u0130RM\u0130YOR<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131n\u0131n, adi yaz\u0131l\u0131 bir belgeyle yap\u0131lan b\u00fct\u00fcn ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n otomatik olarak ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu \u015feklinde yorumlanmamas\u0131 gerekiyor.<\/p>\n<p>Tapulu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 kural olarak tapu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde resm\u00ee \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmak zorunda. Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri de mevzuatta \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen resm\u00ee \u015fekle tabi bulunuyor.<\/p>\n<p>Bu dosyada uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, basit bi\u00e7imde \u201cadi yaz\u0131l\u0131 konut sat\u0131\u015f\u0131\u201d olarak de\u011fil, y\u00fckleniciye d\u00fc\u015fen ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm \u00fczerindeki \u015fahsi hakk\u0131n al\u0131c\u0131ya temlik edilmesi ve bu hakka dayan\u0131larak a\u00e7\u0131lan tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirildi.<\/p>\n<p>Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla karar\u0131n ba\u015fka uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara uygulan\u0131p uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131; s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin niteli\u011fine, bedelin \u00f6denmesine, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n teslim edilmesine, al\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131na, y\u00fcklenicinin hak sahipli\u011fine ve tapuyu sonradan alan ki\u015finin iyi niyetli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re belirlenecek.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EV ALACAKLARIN NELERE D\u0130KKAT ETMES\u0130 GEREK\u0130YOR?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131, ikinci el veya y\u00fckleniciden konut sat\u0131n alacak ki\u015filer a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan fiil\u00ee kullan\u0131m durumunun ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemini bir kez daha g\u00f6sterdi.<\/p>\n<p>Konut almay\u0131 planlayanlar\u0131n;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Tapu kayd\u0131 ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki \u015ferhleri incelemesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Daireyi yerinde g\u00f6rmesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Ta\u015f\u0131nmazda ba\u015fka bir ki\u015finin ya\u015fay\u0131p ya\u015famad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Oturan ki\u015fi varsa hangi hakka dayanarak kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sormas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Y\u00fcklenicinin arsa sahibiyle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi kontrol ettirmesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Sat\u0131\u015f bedeli ve \u00f6deme kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131 belgelendirmesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Resm\u00ee i\u015flem yap\u0131lmadan \u00f6deme konusunda dikkatli davranmas\u0131<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131yor.<\/p>\n<p>Tapu siciline g\u00fcven ilkesi, iyi niyetli \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fileri koruyor. Ancak ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki mevcut kullan\u0131m, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ticari ili\u015fki veya ola\u011fan d\u0131\u015f\u0131 sat\u0131\u015f ko\u015fullar\u0131 al\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n durumu bildi\u011fini ya da gerekli \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermedi\u011fini ortaya koyarsa bu koruma uygulanmayabiliyor.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong>ET\u0130KETLER:#yarg\u0131tay #ev #konut #gayrimenkul #tapu #tapuiptali #taputescil #emlak #t\u00fcketici #y\u00fcklenici #m\u00fcteahhit #iyiniyet #k\u00f6t\u00fcniyet #emsalkarar #hukuk #sontv<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay 6. Hukuk Dairesi, y\u00fckleniciden adi yaz\u0131l\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyle sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 daireye yerle\u015fen t\u00fcketiciyi hakl\u0131 buldu. Dairenin kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilen veya bilebilecek durumda olan ki\u015finin sonradan tapuyu devralmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen iyi niyetli say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmedildi. Tapu iptali ve ilk al\u0131c\u0131 ad\u0131na tescil karar\u0131 oy birli\u011fiyle onand\u0131.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.son.tv\/yargitaydan-ev-alacaklari-sevindiren-karar-tapu-sahibinin-iyi-niyet-savunmasi-kabul-edilmedi\/\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"feedzy-rss-link-icon\">Read More<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SON.TV\/ANKARA Yarg\u0131tay, ayn\u0131 konutun birden fazla ki\u015fiye sat\u0131lmas\u0131 ya da tapusunun daha sonra ba\u015fka bir ki\u015fiye devredilmesi nedeniyle ya\u015fanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara ili\u015fkin dikkat \u00e7eken bir karara imza att\u0131. Yarg\u0131tay 6. Hukuk Dairesi, y\u00fckleniciden sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 daireyi fiilen teslim alarak kullanmaya ba\u015flayan t\u00fcketici lehine verilen tapu iptali ve tescil karar\u0131n\u0131 onad\u0131. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131 sonradan devralan [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40387","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-haberler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40387\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}