\u00a0<\/p>\n
SON.TV\/ANKARA<\/strong><\/p>\n Anayasa Mahkemesi (AYM), 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu\u2019nun 30. maddesinde yer alan ve dava s\u0131ras\u0131nda ger\u00e7ek dava de\u011ferinin dilek\u00e7ede belirtilenden daha y\u00fcksek oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde eksik karar ve ilam harc\u0131 tamamlan\u0131ncaya kadar yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonraki celseye ertelenmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren h\u00fckm\u00fcn iptali istemini reddetti.<\/p>\n 6 A\u011fustos 2026 tarihli Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanan kararda, Ankara 73. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi\u2019nin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz ba\u015fvurusu oy birli\u011fiyle kabul edilmeyerek s\u00f6z konusu d\u00fczenlemenin Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmedildi.<\/p>\n AYM: MAHKEMEYE ER\u0130\u015e\u0130M HAKKI \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LM\u0130YOR<\/strong><\/p>\n Ba\u015fvuruda, eksik har\u00e7 tamamlan\u0131ncaya kadar davaya devam edilmemesinin hukuk devleti ilkesi, hukuki belirlilik, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ve mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n Ancak Anayasa Mahkemesi, eksik harc\u0131n tamamlanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik d\u00fczenlemenin mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131na getirilen \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc ve me\u015fru bir s\u0131n\u0131rlama oldu\u011funa karar verdi.<\/p>\n Kararda, yarg\u0131 hizmetlerinin sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi, gereksiz ve temelsiz davalar\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi ile yarg\u0131 mercilerinin a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc alt\u0131nda kalmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesinin kamu yarar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurguland\u0131.<\/p>\n YARGI H\u0130ZMETLER\u0130N\u0130N SA\u011eLIKLI \u0130\u015eLEMES\u0130 AMA\u00c7LANIYOR<\/strong><\/p>\n AYM karar\u0131nda, karar ve ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6rtte birinin pe\u015fin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n ve eksik harc\u0131n sonraki celseye kadar tamamlanmas\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131lara katlan\u0131lamayacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde a\u011f\u0131r bir y\u00fck getirmedi\u011fi ifade edildi.<\/p>\n Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca, \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fc bulunmayan ki\u015filer i\u00e7in adli yard\u0131m kurumunun mevcut oldu\u011funa da dikkat \u00e7ekerek, d\u00fczenlemenin mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131 orant\u0131s\u0131z \u015fekilde s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti.<\/p>\n OY B\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE RET KARARI<\/strong><\/p>\n Anayasa Mahkemesi, yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonunda Har\u00e7lar Kanunu\u2019nun 30. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan \u201cMuhakeme s\u0131ras\u0131nda\u2026\u201d ve \u201c\u2026yaln\u0131z o celse i\u00e7in muhakemeye devam olunur, takip eden celseye kadar\u2026\u201d ifadelerinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13 ve 36. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n B\u00f6ylece Ankara 73. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi\u2019nin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 iptal ba\u015fvurusu oy birli\u011fiyle reddedildi ve mevcut uygulaman\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte kalmas\u0131na karar verildi.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n ET\u0130KETLER: #anayasamahkemesi #aym #resmigazete #har\u00e7larkanunu #hukuk #yarg\u0131 #i\u015fmahkemesi #adalet<\/strong><\/p>\n Anayasa Mahkemesi, yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda dava de\u011ferinin eksik g\u00f6sterildi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde eksik karar ve ilam harc\u0131 tamamlan\u0131ncaya kadar davaya devam edilmemesini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren d\u00fczenlemeyi Anayasa\u2019ya uygun buldu. Ankara 73. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi\u2019nin iptal ba\u015fvurusu oy birli\u011fiyle reddedildi.\u00a0Read More<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u00a0 SON.TV\/ANKARA Anayasa Mahkemesi (AYM), 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu\u2019nun 30. maddesinde yer alan ve dava s\u0131ras\u0131nda ger\u00e7ek dava de\u011ferinin dilek\u00e7ede belirtilenden daha y\u00fcksek oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde eksik karar ve ilam harc\u0131 tamamlan\u0131ncaya kadar yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonraki celseye ertelenmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren h\u00fckm\u00fcn iptali istemini reddetti. 6 A\u011fustos 2026 tarihli Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanan kararda, Ankara 73. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi\u2019nin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39838","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-haberler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39838","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39838"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39838\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39838"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39838"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39838"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}