{"id":36877,"date":"2026-07-14T07:13:43","date_gmt":"2026-07-14T07:13:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/2026\/07\/14\/sontv-ozel-haber-azerbaycan-devlet-petrol-sirketi-socar-mubariz-mansimov-a-karsi-davayi-istinafta-da-kazandi\/"},"modified":"2026-07-14T07:13:43","modified_gmt":"2026-07-14T07:13:43","slug":"sontv-ozel-haber-azerbaycan-devlet-petrol-sirketi-socar-mubariz-mansimov-a-karsi-davayi-istinafta-da-kazandi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/2026\/07\/14\/sontv-ozel-haber-azerbaycan-devlet-petrol-sirketi-socar-mubariz-mansimov-a-karsi-davayi-istinafta-da-kazandi\/","title":{"rendered":"SONTV \u00d6ZEL HABER! Azerbaycan Devlet Petrol \u015eirketi SOCAR M\u00fcbariz Mansimov \u2018a kar\u015f\u0131 davay\u0131 istinafta da kazand\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

SON.TV\/\u00d6ZEL HABER\/\u0130STANBUL<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Uluslararas\u0131 tahkim kararlar\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye<\/strong>\u2019de tan\u0131nmas\u0131 ve icra edilebilir h\u00e2le getirilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan dikkat \u00e7eken SOCAR-Palmali<\/strong> davas\u0131nda \u00f6nemli bir a\u015fama daha tamamland\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n

Azerbaycan Devlet Petrol \u015eirketi SOCAR, SOCAR Overseas LLC ve SOCAR Trading S.A<\/strong>. taraf\u0131ndan Palmali International Holding ile M\u00fcbariz Gurbano\u011flu\u2019na kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan tan\u0131ma ve tenfiz davas\u0131nda \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 13. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong> karar\u0131n\u0131 verdi.<\/span><\/p>\n

Daire, \u0130stanbul 10. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemes<\/strong>inin \u0130ngiltere\u2019de verilen hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nmas\u0131 ve tenfizine ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc hukuka uygun buldu. Palmali<\/strong> International Holding<\/strong> ile M\u00fcbariz Gurbano\u011flu<\/strong>\u2019nun istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131 ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 esastan reddedildi.<\/span><\/p>\n

YILLARDIR S\u00dcREN DAVALARDA SOCAR\u2019IN ZAFER\u0130<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

SOCAR<\/strong> ile Palmali<\/strong> aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n temelini, 2007 ve 2008 y\u0131llar\u0131nda imzalanan petrol ve petrol \u00fcr\u00fcnlerinin ta\u015f\u0131nmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri ile 16 Aral\u0131k 2016 tarihli Fesih ve Uzla\u015fma Senedi olu\u015fturdu.<\/span><\/p>\n

S\u00f6zle\u015fmeden kaynaklanan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin yerine getirilmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcren SOCAR<\/strong> \u015firketleri, 2018 y\u0131l\u0131nda Londra Denizcilik Hakemleri Birli\u011fi<\/strong> kurallar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda tahkim s\u00fcrecini ba\u015flatt\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00dc\u00e7 ki\u015filik hakem heyeti, 26 Ocak 2021 tarihli karar\u0131nda daval\u0131lar\u0131n SOCAR<\/strong> \u015firketlerine 44 milyon 741 bin 922 dolar ile faiz ve yarg\u0131lama masraflar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demesine h\u00fckmetti. Kararda baz\u0131 maddi d\u00fczeltmeler yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan SOCAR<\/strong>, \u00f6demenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmedi\u011fini belirterek T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de tan\u0131ma ve tenfiz davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n

SOCAR<\/strong>\u2019\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019<\/strong>deki yarg\u0131 s\u00fcreci, \u015firketin avukat\u0131 Elif Sev\u00fcktekin taraf\u0131ndan temsil edildi.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u0130STANBUL 10. ASL\u0130YE T\u0130CARET MAHKEMES\u0130 TENF\u0130Z KARARI VERD\u0130<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul 10. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi, 5 Temmuz 2023<\/strong> tarihli karar\u0131nda Londra<\/strong>\u2019da verilen yabanc\u0131 hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye<\/strong>\u2019de tan\u0131nmas\u0131na ve tenfizine h\u00fckmetti.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mahkeme; tahkim \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011funu, karar\u0131n taraflar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda savunma ve hukuki dinlenilme haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fini ve hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrk kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirdi.<\/span><\/p>\n

Kararda hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n tarihi sehven 26 Ocak 2011 olarak yaz\u0131l\u0131nca, 14 Eyl\u00fcl 2023 tarihli tashih karar\u0131yla do\u011fru tarih olan 26 Ocak 2021 olarak d\u00fczeltildi.<\/span><\/p>\n

PALMAL\u0130 VE MANS\u0130MOV\u2019UN \u0130T\u0130RAZLARI REDDED\u0130LD\u0130<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Palmali International Holding<\/strong> ile M\u00fcbariz<\/strong> Gurbano\u011flu<\/strong>, ilk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurdu.<\/span><\/p>\n

Daval\u0131 taraf; mahkemenin g\u00f6revli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tahkim \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu, savunma ve hukuki dinlenilme haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi, karar\u0131n T\u00fcrk kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde itirazlarda bulundu.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 13. Hukuk Daires<\/strong>i ise bu itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6rmedi.<\/span><\/p>\n

Daire, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n deniz ticaretinden de\u011fil, Fesih ve Uzla\u015fma Senedi\u2019nden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek Denizcilik \u0130htisas Mahkemes<\/strong>inin g\u00f6revli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti. Taraflar aras\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 ve ge\u00e7erli bir tahkim \u015fart\u0131 bulundu\u011fu, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa \u0130ngiltere ve Galler hukukunun uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu hukuk sistemindeki d\u00fczenlemelerin T\u00fcrk hukukundan farkl\u0131 olmas\u0131n\u0131n tek ba\u015f\u0131na kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 belirtildi.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cSAVUNMA HAKKI \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi, Palmal<\/strong>i ile M\u00fcbariz<\/strong> Gurbano\u011flu<\/strong>\u2019nun tahkim yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde avukatla temsil edildi\u011fini, taraflara delillerini sunma ve beyanda bulunma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kaydetti.<\/span><\/p>\n

Kararda, hakem heyetinin taraflar\u0131n kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla duru\u015fmalar\u0131 erteledi\u011fi, takvimi birden fazla kez de\u011fi\u015ftirdi\u011fi ve video konferans y\u00f6ntemiyle kat\u0131l\u0131m imk\u00e2n\u0131 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu ifade edildi.<\/span><\/p>\n

Bu gerek\u00e7elerle adil yarg\u0131lanma ve hukuki dinlenilme haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u0130ST\u0130NAF BA\u015eVURULARI ESASTAN REDDED\u0130LD\u0130<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 13. Hukuk Dairesi, 2 Temmuz 2026 tarihli<\/strong> karar\u0131nda Palmali<\/strong> International<\/strong> Holding<\/strong> ile M\u00fcbariz<\/strong> Gurbano\u011flu<\/strong>\u2019nun istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 esastan reddetti.<\/span><\/p>\n

Daire, \u0130stanbul 10. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi<\/strong>nin tan\u0131ma ve tenfiz karar\u0131n\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun buldu. Karar oy birli\u011fiyle al\u0131nd\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemes<\/strong>i karar\u0131nda, yabanc\u0131 hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n taraflar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve yetkili bir makam taraf\u0131ndan iptal edildi\u011fine ya da icras\u0131n\u0131n durduruldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin delil sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da vurguland\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n

YARGITAY TEMY\u0130Z YOLU A\u00c7IK<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemes<\/strong>i, karar\u0131n taraflara tebli\u011finden itibaren iki haftal\u0131k s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a temyiz ba\u015fvurusu yap\u0131labilece\u011fine h\u00fckmetti.<\/span><\/p>\n

Bu nedenle \u0130ngiltere<\/strong>\u2019de verilen hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve \u0130stanbul 10. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi<\/strong>nin tan\u0131ma-tenfiz h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn istinaf a\u015famas\u0131nda onanmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019deki yarg\u0131 s\u00fcreci hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmi\u015f de\u011fil.<\/span><\/p>\n

Palmali<\/strong> ve M\u00fcbariz Gurbano\u011flu<\/strong>\u2019nun Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong>\u2019a ba\u015fvurma hakk\u0131 bulunuyor.<\/span><\/p>\n

SOCAR, PALMAL\u0130\u2019N\u0130N A\u00c7TI\u011eI BA\u015eKA TAHK\u0130M DAVASINI DA KAZANDI<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

SOCAR<\/strong> ile Palmali<\/strong> aras\u0131ndaki hukuki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar yaln\u0131zca bu dosyayla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 de\u011fil. Palmali<\/strong> \u015firketlerinin 2017 y\u0131l\u0131nda SOCAR<\/strong>\u2019a sat\u0131lan 10 gemiyle ilgili 2023\u2019te ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fka bir Londra tahkim yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda da karar SOCAR<\/strong> lehine \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u015eubat 2026<\/strong>\u2019da verilen bu kararda Palmali\u2019<\/strong>nin talepleri hukuki ve maddi dayanaktan yoksun bulunarak tamamen reddedildi. \u0130ngiliz hukukuna<\/strong> ve Londra<\/strong> Denizcilik Hakemleri Birli\u011fi<\/strong> kurallar\u0131na tabi karar\u0131n kesin ve ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 oldu\u011fu bildirildi.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrkiye<\/strong>\u2019de g\u00f6r\u00fclen tan\u0131ma ve tenfiz davas\u0131 ise farkl\u0131 bir tahkim karar\u0131na, SOCAR<\/strong> \u015firketleri lehine h\u00fckmedilen yakla\u015f\u0131k 44,7 milyon dolarl\u0131k<\/strong> alaca\u011fa dayan\u0131yor.<\/span><\/p>\n

ET\u0130KETLER: <\/span>#SOCAR #Palmali #M\u00fcbarizMansimov #M\u00fcbarizGurbano\u011flu #Tahkim #Tan\u0131maVeTenfiz #\u0130stanbulB\u00f6lgeAdliyeMahkemesi #TicaretMahkemesi #Uluslararas\u0131Tahkim #SonTV<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Azerbaycan Devlet Petrol \u015eirketi SOCAR\u2019\u0131n, Palmali International Holding ve M\u00fcbariz Mansimov\u2019a kar\u015f\u0131 \u0130ngiltere\u2019de kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 tahkim karar\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de tan\u0131nmas\u0131 ve tenfizine ili\u015fkin davada yeni karar \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 13. Hukuk Dairesi, Palmali ile Mansimov\u2019un istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 esastan reddetti. SOCAR\u2019\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131k 44,7 milyon dolarl\u0131k alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin karara kar\u015f\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131.\u00a0Read More<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

SON.TV\/\u00d6ZEL HABER\/\u0130STANBUL Uluslararas\u0131 tahkim kararlar\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de tan\u0131nmas\u0131 ve icra edilebilir h\u00e2le getirilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan dikkat \u00e7eken SOCAR-Palmali davas\u0131nda \u00f6nemli bir a\u015fama daha tamamland\u0131. Azerbaycan Devlet Petrol \u015eirketi SOCAR, SOCAR Overseas LLC ve SOCAR Trading S.A. taraf\u0131ndan Palmali International Holding ile M\u00fcbariz Gurbano\u011flu\u2019na kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan tan\u0131ma ve tenfiz davas\u0131nda \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 13. Hukuk Dairesi karar\u0131n\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":36878,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36877","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-haberler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36877","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36877"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36877\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36878"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36877"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36877"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abchukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36877"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}